Skip to main content

The Kenmore Ensemble: An Introduction

In this adventure there are 9 machines that will be tested.

An important thing to note about the models for Kenmores of this era is the context of the naming scheme. "XXX.MM(MM)Y" The XXX being the general design numbers such as 117, 158, or 148. These often correlate with the manufacturer of the machine and the region of sale. MM(MM) mean while is the model. I have seen model numbers that are from two digits to four digits. All the models I'll be writing on in this series are four digits.

Model Number and Serial Plate

The last number is the Y, and is always the Y no matter how many M's precede it. It is often casually implied as the manufacturing year, 0 being the first year of manufacture. From what I've actually seen, it's more like revision number just like in modern computing when they go from 2.0 to 2.1. A major revision has been made, but it isn't different enough to be a new machine. With this, sometimes multiple revisions can happen in one year, or a single revision can span several years of manufacture.

If you want to look up your machine check out this link from Sears Archive

An attempt was made to get each machine to be of a different manufacturing design year, but book keeping errors and an over zealous interest in getting the experiment started sort of caused and issue with that.

So instead I have *mostly* different design years for each model.

(Maybe I can answer if one revision is better than another. We'll see.)

I came up with some names for the machines based upon female literary heroines.  Classic literature for some classic machines.

The Kenmores in Question 158 series by start years:

  • 1968
    • 18021 (Elizabeth)
  • 1969
    • 16010 (Helen)
    • 17010 (Jo)
  • 1970
    • 16011 (Jane)
    • 18023 (Scout)
    • 18023 (Anne)
  • 1974
    • 18140 (Lily)
  • 1975
    • 18141 (Emma)
    • 18141 (Dominique)

You have seen them before, but without really knowing what was going on!
1601 (Yellow Tags)  1701 (Pink Tag) 1802 (Orange Tag) 1814 (Blue Tag)

The 1601 models were ultimately manufactured between '69-'71. While 1802, the "Sears Best" big sister to the 1601 were between '68-'72. The odd ball mid guy the 1701 popped up between '69-'70. The years jump to getting to the 1814 models of '74-'75.

The models in this experiment were chosen based upon the internet rumor mill about general build quality, as well as feel, sound, and usage. In general, the scuttle-butt is that the 1802 and 1914 models have been seen as the Kenmore Cream of the Crop. So I went for those machines and their little siblings.

I shied away from the 1914 ultimately because they are so sought after that bidding for them, or buying them was cost prohibitive. But the 1814 is, from all I could tell online and in schematics, just the flat bed model of the same design. 1914 being an early free arm beauty that is slightly lighter.

Craigslist, StageCoachRoad, eBay, and forums helped me acquire these pretties. And before I really get running, I'm going to make sure each of them fully function before testing.

Stay tuned for individual entries for each machine.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

To Helen Black: An introduction to 1601s

I'm working with the machines now, not in chronological order, but in complexity order. So the first machine I have worked with is Helen. This bird is a 158.16010. She has a slightly green, maybe mint, enamel casing. Quick things you'll note about her and what basically drew me to these generations of machines is the simplicity of the design. Proof Helen is indeed a machine Basic features that are identical across the 1601/1701/1802 line are the side opening door to get to the light bulb, the easy to remove top (it is just held on with a tension clip around), and the order of the knobs. From left to right up to down, Stitch Width, Reverse Stitch Modifier, Stitch length (with reverse button), and Stitch Selector.  Everything is upfront and easy to access. All the machines I will be testing are flat bed, so to get to the bobbin casing there is either lifting up the machine and tilting it back, or popping out the access plate and hoping your hands are small enough to re

Helen and Jane Adventures: Part 1

My previous entries covered the first impressions between the two machines. And with both of them I have a bit of exploration to go through before I can say definitively anything about the design. Helen (16010) & Jane (16011) One thing I can say for both of these machines, they are strong. You can feel the power when working with them. And neither of them are particularly loud for their strength. Working on these vintage machines, you feel like you are unstoppable in comparison to the computerized machines I have worked with (Bernina Bernette 25 is my go to dearest). They have the same feeling as I get with my mechanical near industrial serger (Juki MO-735). They go through the material like there is nothing there. This was even the case when on Helen, I hadn't quite corrected the bobbin issue and I was destroying my needle points. I also know that Jane is more than capable on hemming jeans. She's the machine that got me into this mess in the first place. I that serger