Skip to main content

One step forward....

With the prep for this project I took some old fabric and reinforced it with fusible interfacing and cut them into roughly business card sizes. These little things I have been using for stitch samples.

They will not be 100% professional looking as they are partially about getting to know the machine's quirks for each stitch.

Largely the machines have been stitched with a length of between 1 and 2, and a width of 4, except for the straight stitch, which by its own nature has no width. And these machines are not yet advanced enough to have straight stitching offsets.

There have been some casualties as I have worked on making these little stitch cards. The biggest being just the cards themselves. I have a particular loathing for rotary cutting. It is extremely useful for a straight line, but cutting hundreds of rectangles is just something I don't much care for doing. I have made TWO whole quilts in my life, and I only had to cut pieces for one of them... never again if I can avoid it.


These little rectangles start off at 1.75 by 3.325 inch cards, slightly smaller than a typical business card. I got the idea for this from this blog. I found the idea most appealing as I'm working with a machine that I don't know if everything I have will work well for it. I don't know what pattern cams will work, and what one's won't. More over, I don't want to have to redo an ENTIRE page of a stitch book just because it missed a stitch or because the tension was wrong for a single pattern.

This was a great choice by the way. As of this moment, I have stitched samples for both Helen (16010) and Jane (16011), and have had all sorts of adventures getting the tension right, and getting the stitch right looking. Please see the pending blogs on both Helen and Jane for the details.I have made some mistakes. Both in cutting them, and in sewing through them. I attempted to ease my distaste of rotary cutting by getting a rotary cutting craft cutter. The kind that is supposed to go through foam and cardstock with no issues. That took a learning curve. But in the end most of the pieces looked alright. My guess is if my interfacing wasn't so squishy and was more stiff it would have worked better. Lessons learned, right?

 


All in all hundreds of little pieces of fabric later, I'm sewing and making!

I really do recommend this style of stitch book though. It has been marvelous. When I sell my machines I'm going to include full stitch books. And if someone just doesn't like the look of a particular stitch, they can easily redo the piece and change it out in the book. That's pretty cool.


Labels

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

(NaCl(aq) NaCl(aq))/ (C C C C C C C) Cams

Saline, Saline over the Seven C-Cams. Ahoy! These waters you tread are dangerous indeed. The sirens are a'calling, and you may find yourself lost before you see a shore again. We'll be a' talkin' about the Kenmore cams. /me clears throat For the Kenmore Experiment, I wanted to help set you all up with what you'll be seeing me work with that isn't really in many modern sewing machines. PATTERN CAMS! These little beauties are not really seen with modern machines any more for a number of reasons. One of which being that they just build them all in now for simple mechanical machines, or can program them into the onboard computer and never bother yourself with cams again. Pattern Cams are actually a fancy name for the mechanic that helps make your stitch shape. Sort of a mechanical instruction for your machine for where the needle is supposed to go, and how the machine should move the fabric. Mix of C-Cams and Monogram cams that I sold   To me...
Post a Comment
Read more

Helen and Jane Adventures: Part 1

My previous entries covered the first impressions between the two machines. And with both of them I have a bit of exploration to go through before I can say definitively anything about the design. Helen (16010) & Jane (16011) One thing I can say for both of these machines, they are strong. You can feel the power when working with them. And neither of them are particularly loud for their strength. Working on these vintage machines, you feel like you are unstoppable in comparison to the computerized machines I have worked with (Bernina Bernette 25 is my go to dearest). They have the same feeling as I get with my mechanical near industrial serger (Juki MO-735). They go through the material like there is nothing there. This was even the case when on Helen, I hadn't quite corrected the bobbin issue and I was destroying my needle points. I also know that Jane is more than capable on hemming jeans. She's the machine that got me into this mess in the first place. I that serger ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jane Doe: Discovery

The next 1601 I tested, and the only other one in my possession is Jane. A 158.16011. Right off the bat, I know she's going to take a little bit of work before I can send her on her way one day. Her drop feed sticks. The feed dogs have no problem being up and working, and being down and staying there. But transitioning between the two can be a bit of a challenge. This, thankfully doesn't keep me from doing any testing with her, I just need to make sure I get that resolved between now and October (when I hope to post the machines up for sale) Boy oh boy does she sew. What's that Mazda slogan, "Zoom, Zoom"? She's got that in droves. In a way that I'm actually having the feeling I'm going to have to investigate. Because she flies a bit free after I lift my foot from the pedal. Inertia keeps her going for sometimes as much as TWO whole new stitches. She's a smooth operator/drag racer. A design change I can note between Helen and Jane is the reverse...
Post a Comment
Read more